Saturday, October 23, 2010

Salt! The Sneaky Brick Killing Ninja!

I know when we think of threats to historic structure salt is generally not very high on the list, but it should be. All masonry and stone structures are susceptible to salt damage, for the sake of simplicity I will focus on brick. Bricks are porous and dissolved salts can enter them via capillary suction. The salt then crystallizes inside of the brick. Salt crystals expand and contract in the presence of water, over time this can damage the masonry’s structural integrity on a microscopic level.

Salt crystals can form on the interior or exterior of a masonry structure. Salt crystallization on the exterior of a structure is called efflorescence; this form of salt crystallization can cause pitting on the structures surface. Salt crystallization on the interior of a structure is called subflorescence; this form of salt crystallization can cause weaken and destroy the materials structural integrity. Efflorescence is externally visible which makes it easier to diagnose and treat than subflorescence. The presence of subflorescence is not externally conspicuous, making it a silent killer, the ninja of salt damage.

The susceptibility of different bricks to salt damage depends on the size and distribution of the bricks pores; large pores tend to allow salts to flow freely into and out of the brick, however small pores tend to trap salts within the brick.

One method of treating subflorescence is local desalination, and it is achieved by saturating a wall with water and applying a poultice over it. A poultice is a removable layer of material applied to a structures surface to absorb the dissolved salts from the wall. A poultice can be composed of paper fibers, cotton fibers or clay.

Here are some images of an experiment SCAD historic preservation students preformed to compare the effectiveness of paper and clay poultices in removing salts from Savannah gray brick.

Savannah Gray Brick after a soak in saline solution

Savannah Gray Brick with toilet paper poultice applied to its left side and a clay poultice on its right.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

McDonalds: Preservation Friend or Foe


Savannah’s National Historic Landmark District may see its first McDonalds open in the near future. This news was a point of contention for many Savannah locals. On March 16 McDonalds went public with their intentions to open a franchise in downtown Savannah, shortly after Matthew J. Roher, Chef of Savannah’s Cha Bella restaurant, started a “No McDonalds on Broughton” facebook group . which has grown to over 1000+ members.

The proposed location is at 246 W. Broughton St. within a currently vacant building, constructed in 1924, which is a contributing structure in the National Historic Landmark District.





The building is owned by local lawyer Daryl Walker. He purchased the building in the early 80’s with the intention to renovate it however the cost of the renovation was much greater that he anticipated so his plans for improvements fell flat. The building has now stood vacant for nearly 20 years and it has fallen in to a state of severe disrepair.
Daniel Carey of the Savannah Historic Society at the prospect of McDonalds renovating and occupying the historic structure"We're encouraged when vacant buildings can be brought back to life…………The adaptive use of this vacant, historic building, which is a rated and a contributing building to the National Historic Landmark District, is a positive."
However I when I attended (my first and surprisingly exciting) Historic Review Board meeting on April 14 I watched him express disdain over McDonald’s proposed addition of a walk up window to the structure. Daniel Carey was definitely not a

Board member Robin Williams appeared to share the apprehension over the walk up window, stating that “it changes the character of façade and alters the symmetry that exists”

Over all the hearing ran went extremely well for McDonald’s, in spite of the contention caused by the walk up window, and McDonald’s exterior plans passed fan of “poke[ing] a hole in a historic building.” the Historic Review Board with a 6 to 1 vote of approval.


........So McDonalds; preservation friend or foe?
You decide.

**********************************************************


Thursday, April 8, 2010

City Market/ Ellis Square




Of Savannah’s four original squares one, Ellis square, did not remain a square for very long. In 1763 the first of three markets was built over Ellis square, it burnt down in the fire of 1796. The second market shared a similar fate, it burnt down in the fire of 1820. In 1822 the third and final iteration of this market was built, it was appropriately named City Market. The City market building was a three part open air Italianate brick structure. This market was a vibrant part of savannah’s social fabric, not only did local farmers and butchers sell their wares here, but the sight also held social functions, including an annual ball. During the Civil war the market was used as a dressing station for wounded confederate soldiers and the market bell was used to alert the city to the outcome of major events.



Despite the long standing role City Market played in Savannah’s socio-economic composition, doubts over its future arose in the late1940’s. [1]The markets rising operation costs and decreased profits[2], coupled with the growing desire for more down town parking, spelled doom for the historic site. For two years a divided city debated the markets fate, Downtown business owners wanted it torn down so they could have more parking, preservationist wanted to see the site preserved as for history. The debate ended in 1953 the preservationist lost. In 1954 City Market was torn down and shortly thereafter replaced by a parking garage. Many considered the parking garage to be a huge eyesore marring the face of downtown savannah. Plans for its destruction were being drafted even before the expiration of its 50 year lease. In 2002 it was torn down and replaced with an underground parking facility and the city began the process of “reclaiming” Ellis Square.[3] The city considered numerous idea for how best to use the space, including the idea of creating another market. Ultimately the city chose to fill the void with an updated version of the Savannah’s traditional garden square.



Plan of the newly "reclaimed" Ellis Square

Prior to its demolition City Market hosted a final ball. The images of this historic sites last hurrah were so moving they found their way to the cover of the Time’s and other national publications, the attention national media paid to a “local” loss verified our nation’s growing interest in preserving sites of historic and cultural significance. The loss of City Market was a huge blow for preservation minded Savannahians. It served as the catalysts for a group of seven preservation minded to band together in 1955 and form the Historic Savannah Foundation. [4] [5] The mission of the Historic Savannah Foundation is to preserve historic structures with in Savannah to ensure that heritage losses like City Market don’t reoccur. The achievements of the Historic Savannah Foundation include convincing the state legislature to pass an amendment to the Georgia constitution authorizing historic zoning in Savannah in 1968 and the establishment of the Historic Review Board in 1973[6] and the establishment of compatibility criteria, set forth in the Historic District Ordinance, for new and existing structures in the historic district which regulates aspect of new development such as building height.



Savannah is a modern city is a city conflicted over progressing towards the future and preserving the past. It has suffered great historic losses in the name of progress and achieved great feats in the name of preservation. Savannah’s preservation movement is a testament to the power of grassroots movements, the ability of small impassioned groups of individuals to come together and shape the development of their community’s future. The preservation movement reminds us that while progress itself is not a bad thing it shouldn’t come at the expense of our history. Through conservation and adaptive reuse we can pave the way towards the creation of Cities whose worth is measured not only by their ability to adapt to the further, but also by the richness of their architectural heritage.

[1] “City Market” file. Vertical Stacks, Georgia Historical Society, Savannah. Article titled “one square suffers round peg”
[2] “City Market ” file. Vertical Stacks, Georgia Historical Society, Savannah. One 1950 newspaper clipping: expressed surprise and relief when the market announced that it had managed to stay in budget for the year, the clipping expressed the widely held hope that the market could be saved.
[3] “Ellis Square” file. Vertical Stacks, Georgia Historical Society, Savannah.
[4]The New Georgia Encyclopedia, “History of Historic Preservation”; available from http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-718; Internet accessed 1 april 2010.
[5] Morgan Lee Harrison. Paths to Involvement: Women and the Early Preservation
Movement in Savannah.
[6]The New Georgia Encyclopedia, “The Historic Savannah Foundation”; available from http://www.georgiaencyclopedia.org/nge/Article.jsp?id=h-1129; Internet accessed 1 april 2010.

The Olde Pink House

Of the many historic structures that compose Savannah’s National Historic Landmark District #32 Abercorn St., known to locals as The Pink House, is one of the most significant. The Pink House is Savannah’s only serving 18th century masonry structure[1]. Built in 1790 the property was originally home to a member of one of Savannah’s founding families, James Habersham. The original structure comprised of a Georgian style home with a six over six window arrangement and a central hall floor plan. A Palladian window is located above the entrance and the structures corners feature prominent stucco quoins. Between 1812-1820 a front porch with unfluted Doric columns was added . The addition to the north side and the window cornices where added in the mid 19th century.[2]


The property has weathered through many hardships and the majority of Savannah’s history. The Pink House survived the fire of 1796 which claimed over 200 homes. In 1812 it became Planters Bank, the first bank to exist in the State of Georgia, and it held British gold captured in the war of 1812. In 1820 the pink house survived another large fire. During the civil war it served as General York’s head quarters.[3] After the civil war Planters bank closed its doors, the property then hosted a stream of short term tenets and began a slow decline in to a state of neglect.[4]



In 1940 the Society for the Preservation of Historic Landmarks tried to purchase the Pink House, however their plan fell through when they failed to negotiate a price[5]. Shortly thereafter it received some much needed attention when Alida Harper Folwk took it upon herself to revive the struggling business of the Pink house’s primary tenet The Georgia Tea Room.[6] Sadly by the late 1960’s The Pink house was once more in a state of utter dilapidation. In 1970 the building’s luck changed for the better when it was purchased by Jeffrey Kieth who restored the building to its former glory.[7] The survival of The Pink House is a success story which emphasizes the power of grass root community efforts to preserve our architectural history.


[1] “Pink House” file. Vertical Stacks, Georgia Historical Society, Savannah.
[2] Morgan Lee Harrison. Paths to Involvement: Women and the Early Preservation
Movement in Savannah. Savannah, Ga. : Savannah College of Art and Design, 2006
[3] Historic American Buildings Survey “Habersham House, Reynolds Square Vicinity, Savannah, Chatham County, GA” avalible at http://hdl.loc.gov/loc.pnp/hhh.ga0023; accessed 1 April 2010. HABS data page no. 3
[4] “Pink House” file. Vertical Stacks, Georgia Historical Society, Savannah.
[5] ibid
[6]Morgan Lee Harrison. Paths to Involvement: Women and the Early Preservation
Movement in Savannah. Savannah, Ga. : Savannah College of Art and Design, 2006
[7] “Pink House” file. Vertical Stacks, Georgia Historical Society

Early Urban Development of Savannah Georgia


The settlement of Savannah was established in 1733. Savannahs location was picked for its natural defenses, high ground situated between swamp land and a forty-foot high bluff overlooking the Savannah River.[1] Oglethorpe planned the settlement as a series of 540’ x 600’ wards. Each ward possesses a centralized public square around which equally sized building lots are arranged. [2] In 1733 four ward where created, one year later that number grew to six, and by 1800 the number of wards in savannah had doubled to twelve.
At the onset of the 19th century Savannah’s squares and street side benefited from a town wide landscaping initiative which reflected the growing tastes for romantic picturesque garden landscaping that had become popular in Europe.[3] In the 1840s, William Brown Hodgson conceived set aside 10 acres of woodlands for a public recreational park.[4] In 1851 these plans where realized in the form of Forsyth Park, named for Governor John Forsyth. The Park was designed by Bavarian landscape gardener William Biscoff.[5] A twenty-one-acre Park Extension was added in 1867. The Victorian era neighborhoods established after the creation of the Forsyth Park lacked the distinguishing garden squares of the older wards.






[1] “Our Georgia History: James Edward Oglethorpe”; available from http://ourgeorgiahistory.com/people/oglethorpe.html
[2] Savannah Area Convention & Visitors Bureau “Savannah’s history”; available from http://savannahvisit.com/media/savannahs-history.
[3] Turpin C. Bannister, “Oglethorpe's Sources for the Savannah Plan” Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians, Vol. 20, No. 2 (May, 1961), pp. 47
[4] Georgia Historical Society, “Historic Marker Index”; available from http://www.georgiahistory.com/markers/49; Internet accessed 1 April 2010
[5] Turpin C. Bannister, “Oglethorpe's Sources for the Savannah Plan”, pp. 48

Thursday, April 1, 2010

The Tao of CAD

Simple AutoCAD truths that help harmonize drafter with computer.

The Esc key will set you free.

Object snap is a true friend: look to it for guidance to insure your line complete its journey.

To turn off the active layer is to shame and anger it, and in the end it will cause you great pain.

Save regularly so you don’t work in vain.

Plan the placement of your dimensions to be clean and clear, not cluttered and repetitious.

Keep your layers well managed and life will be easier for it.

Dimensions cannot be fudged.

Do not draft upon layer zero, keep it clean so exploded objects won’t become clustered.

Sunday, March 7, 2010

three takes on architecture

SOME FUN

A SMART STANCE ON OLD STRUCTURES


Adaptive reuse is the process of adapting old structures for purposes other than those initially intended. Through adaptive reuse we can retrofit old buildings to fulfill new uses. It preserves the heritage of a site, it is cheaper than creating an entirely new building, and is environmentally friendly . Some notable examples of adaptive reuse include:


http://www.thehighline.org/
Looking South from the Current Northern Terminus of the High Line
The High Line is a 1.45-mile New York City park built on a section of the former elevated freight railroad (1930’s) of the West Side Line, along the lower west side of Manhattan.

Western Metal Supply Co.
the historic brick structure of the Western Metal Supply Co. building at 7th Avenue (between K and L Streets) was preserved and incorporated into the design of PETCO Park, the new baseball-only ballpark of the San Diego Padres, and can be prominently seen in the left-field corner of that ballpark. It now houses the team's flagship gift shop, luxury rental suites, a restaurant and rooftop bleachers, and its southeast corner serves as the ballpark's left field foul pole.



AND A SPRINKLE OF URBAN HOUSING

a little fun and a look at the benefits of adaptive reuse

Some of the content in this documentary seemed a tad dooms-day-ish to me, but over all I felt that it made good points about the benefits of New Urbanism and the unsustainable nature of suburban life (It gave me repeated flashbacks of San Antonio’s endless cookie-cutter houses and night-mare they call driving beyond the loop). I do wish that the documentary delved more in to historic preservation and adaptive rehabilitation as a means of green urban renewal.

Honoring Eileen Gray's Design Career: for its acomplishments and its conflicts


Eileen Gray is an under recognize leader of the modernist movement. Her first design, E. 1027, was on the cutting edge of modern domestic architecture: fulfilling many of the conceptual ideals of the modernist movement, without forsaking the primal and emotional needs of its inhabitance. E.1027 is a major cultural site for modern domestic architecture which possesses a turbulent past and a bright future.

Kathleen Eileen Moray Smith was born in Ireland on August 9, 1878. She was the youngest of five children in a well established Scott-Irish family. Her name changed to Eileen Gray after her mother, Lady Eveleen Pounden, inherited an uncle’s title and became Baroness Gray . Eileen’s father was a painter, which likely helped Eileen develop a keen eye for good design aesthetics at an early age. She studied fine arts at the Slade school of fine arts in London, and the École Colarossi and the Académie Julian in Paris. Initially Eileen specialized in furniture design and opened a small shop, Jean Desert, to exhibit her work. Eileen kept tabs on current architectural pools of thought, taking great interest in the De Stijl movement, the Bauhaus school, and the works la Corbusier. Gray befriended Jean Badovici, the editor of a renowned avant-garde publication l'Architecture Vivante. Gray attributed Jean as her inspiration to delve in to architecture. Later in life, Eileen recalled "Badovici said to me: why don't you build? I laughed in his face. I had always loved architecture - more than anything - but I didn't think myself capable of it."

E-1027 was the first house designed by Eileen Gray. The name E.1027 was Eileen’s way of thanking and accrediting Jean Badovici for his suggestions and support, which helped her design reach fruition. E. 1027 is an acronym of sorts representing Eileen and Badovici’s names; the E stands for E, which is the first letter of Eileen’s name, the 10 stands for J, as in Jean, because J is the 10th letter of the alphabet, the 2 is for the 2nd letter of the alphabet B, for Badovici, and the 7 is G for Gray . The site was designed as a summer home for Badovici how ever Eileen and Badovici shared the home for several years, until Jeans drinking and womanizing strained their relationship. It is unclear whether Jean and Eileen where romantically involved or just close friends.

The site, an oceanfront cliff side near the town of Roquebrune, was chosen for its isolation, it is inaccessible by car, however it is within walking distance of a train station. The site was so difficult to get to that all of the building materials had to be carted in by wheelbarrows. Eileen spent months analyzing the rocky hostile terrain; she observed the rock face, the wind patterns, and the behavior of light so that she could take advantage of every facet of the site. She decided not to alter the landscape but instead allow the house to cling to the cliffs inherent form, giving the house the appearances of a vessel stranded on the cliff face.



E-1027 is the quintessential modern house, and it reflected many of the ideas of the modern movement. Her design considered thoughts on hygiene, purity, and the home as a machine for living. Her home followed Le Corbusier’s “5 points of the New Architecture.” Much like Le Corbusier’s Citroehan house, E.1027 stands on pilotis, possesses horizontal windows, and a rooftop which could be reached by stairs. Another design convention E.1027 shares with Citroehan house are ground level servant’s quarters. E. 1027 is also comparable to De Stijle architect Gerrit Rietveld’s Schroder house for its use of movable screens, and its uses changing floor colors to divide space and imply functional changes. Another way E.1027 is similar to the Schroder is in its lack of visual hierarchy.

E.1027 is a small house , sixteen hundred square feet on the ground level and twelve hundred square feet on the first. It was designed in the spirit of “mason minimums”, small easily replicable houses that where popularized during the housing shortage which followed world war one. She wished to create a"house envisaged from a social point of view: minimum of space, maximum of comfort." E.1027 is a concrete pier and beam construction. In the spirit of industrialization Eileen used prefabricated elements in the wall panels, windows, and doors. The flooring is composed of glass tile. She modified vernacular shutters to create an intricate system of membrane windows. Gray also experimented with original pairings of natural and synthetic materials. Gray used chrome, tubular steel, or Bakelite, together with cork, slate, and exotic woods




Eileen gray once wrote “The poverty of modern architecture stems from the atrophy of sensuality” , and sensuality is the factor that sets the Gray’s architecture apart from other modernist structures. Eileen believed that the overly intellectualized. Gray set her designs apart by allowing them to yield to the emotional and primal wants of an individual, refusing to let them simply fulfill the conceptual ideals of modern architecture. Rex Martoensien, a South African architect and contributor to the SA Architectural Record, praised the design of E.1027 for its ability to “go beyond the apparent frigidity of a purely intellectual solution” and respond to “the passions and desires of the individual and the romantically evocative site” Eileen believed “une oevre ne vaut que par l’amour don’t elle temoigne” (a work acquires its value only though the love it manifest). Much of her furnature was plush and comfortable, such as her playful Bibendum She employed lush furs to accent added comfort in bedrooms and sofas. Eileen’s attention to creature comforts went beyond the necessities, to include a divan for sunbathing with a built in cocktail table surrounded by an innovative “sand trough”, where one could cool off the feet in moist sand without attracting mosquitoes.

The machine like functionality of E.1027 was greatly enhanced by Gray’s innovative built-ins and furniture designs. Eileen designed numerous pieces of built in furniture for E.1027 to enhance the functionality of certain spaces. For example the very modestly sized guest room features a wardrobe with a skylight illuminated interior, corner shelves, that don’t slide open, but swing open on pivoting hinges, and a shoe cabinet with a downward singing door which opens horizontal to the ground. The very same guest room also features an illuminated writing desk which can be stowed, like a tray table, within a long horizontal cabinet. Grays free standing furniture is equally impressive in its functionality.

Gray’s earlier furniture designs where mainly labor intensive and incredibly lavish lacquer pieces. Eileen wished for her furniture to keep its plush appeal while becoming easier for her to replicate and sell. Eileen began designing chrome tubing furniture in 1926, two years before La Corbusier even showed his first piece metal tube furniture. Her quick adaptation of new materials easily places her among the avant-garde of the design realm. Her use of chrome metal tubing was fully realized in the free standing furniture of E.1027. One such design is a bedside table with a tray that can raised to sit higher or lower as need dictates. Another of grays notable chrome pieces includes the gate leg table with suspended rotating trays for fruits and cakes and an extendable dining surface.

Perhaps due impart to the isolated location of E.1027, or even the fact that it was Eileen Gray’s first design realized architectural design E.1027 received limited critical acclaim when it was first built. Some notable acclaim includes, aforementioned praise in the SA Architectural Record, and an October 1930 issue of German magazine Der Baumiester, which featured E.1027 alongside Le Corbusier’s Villa Savoye. Of the limited acclaim Eileen received there were two instances which Eileen truly relished, one was a special issue of l'Architecture Vivante Written by her friend and partner Jean Badovici entitled E. 1027: Maison en bord de mer, and the other was a personal letter from Le Corbusier. Eileen savored her issue of l'Architecture Vivante because it displayed and talked about her work in a way typically reserved for much more established architects. Le Corbusier’s letter, dated April 28 1938, absolutely enthralled her. Le Corbusier wrote Eileen complementing her design after spending a week with Badovici at E.1027. Even though the letter was unpublished for decades Eileen initially held Le Corbusier letter in the most esteem. Le Corbusier warmly praised her design “I am so happy to tell you how much those few days spent in your house have made me appreciate the rare spirit which dictates all the organisation, inside and outside, and given to the modern furniture - the equipment - such dignified form, so charming, so full of spirit.” however his praise was didn’t remain sacred for long.


Le Corbusier coveted E.1027, and he was determined to make his mark on the design. Later that very same year, Le Corbusier convinced Badovici let him paint several frescos in E.1027 as a ‘gift.’ Neither Le Corbusier nor Badovici thought to ask Eileen for her permission to proceed. The murals were big, bold, and very sexual. Eileen was outraged and viewed the paintings as intellectual rape, not only did she think they were graphically garish, but she also felt that they obliterated the spatial ambiguity her walls had possessed. Le Corbusier inadvertent disregard of Gray did not end there. In 1960 in his book My Work, Le Corbusier first depicts one of the frescos from E.1027 without crediting Eileen, and further along in the publication he talks about the E.1027 frescos a second time, this time stating that they are in the “Badovici and Helen Gray house in Cap Martin.” After world war two ended Le Corbusier visits to E.1027 grew in frequency. In 1949 Le Corbusier wrote letters to Badovici proposing a variety of changes he felt needed to be made to E.1027’s design, such as removing the screen that separates main entrance from the living room, fortunately Badovici didn’t yield to many of Le Corbusier suggestions. During the 1950’s Le Corbusier obsession with E.1027 was palpable, frustrated by his inability to control E.1027, he purchased the lot next door and built a small shack over looking E.1027. In doing so he illuminated the visual isolation Eileen had chosen the site for.


In 1956 Jean Badovici died and Le Corbusier wrote his eulogy, in which he mentioned that Badovici and “Ellen Grey built a charming house in Cap Martin” . Badovici promised Eileen that he would leave her E.1027, however Badovici failed to make a will before he died, so house went up for auction. Le Corbusier knew this was his chance to finally obtain the object of his covetousness, so he swayed Madame Schelbert, a close friend and a collector of his designs to purchase E.1027. Schelbert was not thrilled with she saw the house, but under the wrongful impression that Le Corbusier had designed it, she went through with the auction. When she failed to place the winning bid Le Corbusier used his clout to cut a deal with the auctioneer. Eileen was extremely upset by the entire situation. By providence Le Corbusier drowned in front of E.1027 ten years later, to the month.

Eileen Gray’s inadequate recognition for her contributions to modern architecture can be attributed to multiple factors. In life Badovici had always been willing to accept more than his share of credit for the design of E.1027, and Eileen never protested it. Even in a posthumous show, organized by Union des Artistes Modernes (UAM) in 1956, Badovici was awarded credit for Eileen’s designs via photographs of E.1027 tagged: “Jean Badovici with collaboration of Eileen Gray for the furniture” This coupled with the Le Corbusier’s failure to properly credit (and spell) Eileen Gray. There was a period of confusion over how involved, if at all, Eileen Gray was in the design of E.1027. There is also the fact that Eileen was a female in a very male dominate profession. She was one of the founding members of the Union des Artistes Modernes, but she often felt that she didn’t receive the same level of respect as her male counterparts. During a 1931 exhibition with UAM at the Pavilion Mason she complained that she was given a terrible spot only to be moved to a worse location . Numerous times Eileen would find her work on display unlabeled. One of the most noteworthy bad experiences with UAM involved Badovici’s posthumous show. Her offers to help with the show were denied, and even after talking to the UAM president, Rene Herbst, about fixing the erroneous labels she was ignored.

After the passing of Madame Schelbert, all of Eileen’s original furniture pieces were removed from E.1027. Since then E-1027 has fallen in to a state of total disrepair. Years of vacancy, and weathering, coupled with damage incurred by squatters, and from vandalism took their toll on this historic structure. E-1027 has survived. Public outcry over the dilapidated state of E.1027 yielded plans to restore the site and establish it as a museum of of modernism. The bill for this project, which is projected to cost €800,000, will be paid by the French government, the town of Roquebrune , and the department "Alpes Maritimes".
When the structural restoration is complete, replicas, and originals if possible, of Eileen Grays furniture will be installed.

The establishment of E. 1027 as a museum reaffirms the cultural significance of E.1027 and reinforces its position as a significant site in architecture history. This also reaffirms the importance of Eileen Gray an architect. Grey’s innovative designs and early adaptation of cutting edge materials like with metal tube place her among the design worlds avant-garde. The turbulence between La Corbusier and Eileen surrounding E.1027

sources

Primary

Gray archive, Victoria and Albert Museum, London.Gray displayed her photographs of E.1027at the first exhibition of the Union des Artistes Modernes (1930). A UK based archive of primary documents concening Eileen Gray.

Gray, Eileen, and Jean Badovici. "La Maison Minimum." L'Architecture d'Aujourd'hui (1930): 61-62.a write up concerning the benefits of “Maison Minimums"

Gray, Eileen, and Jean Badovici. l'Architecture Vivante : E. 1027: Maison en bord de mer (winter1929) A special issue entirely devoted to Eileen’s E.1027.

Le Corbusier, My Work trans. James Palmes (London: The Architectural Press, 1960), p. 50. A compilation of Le Corbusier life works.
Secondary

Adam, Peter. Eileen Gray: Architect/designer. New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1987. Adetailed biographical account of Eileen’s life and works.

Caroline Constant "E. 1027: The Nonheroic Modernism of Eileen Gray." The Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 53, no. 3, pp226 Journal reflecting on the underappreciated accomplishments of Eileen Gray.

Joan Ockman “Review: Two Women in Architecture” Journal of Architectural Education (1984-), Vol. 46, No. 1 (Sep., 1992), pp. 51-55. A comparison of two female Architects active in the first half of the twentieth century

O’Reilly, Patrica. "Gray's E.1027." Home. http://www.patriciaoreilly.net/html/gray_s_e_1027.html (accessed November 4, 2009).
An article about the need to restore E.1025

Rault, Jasmine. "Occupying E.1027: Reconsidering Le Corbusier’s "Gift" to Eileen Gray." Space and Culture 8 (n.d.): 160-179. An article discussing Le Corbusiers wall paintings in E.1027

Zijl, Ida van "Interior." In The Rietveld Schroder House. New York: Princeton Architectural Press, 2000. 22-30 a article referd to gain more info on the Schroderhouse for comparison purposes
The first post is always the hardest. What can one say that is worthy of interrupting the purity and potential of an empty blog? ……… Well I don’t have the slightest idea.

So I guess the easiest course of action would be to outline my intentions for my personal slice of the blogosphere. I am a student studying Architecture and Historic preservation. Like most other bloggers out there I will be writing about topics that interest me, which (as my the blogs title suggests) will mainly include topics in the realms of architecture, historic preservation, and adaptive Rehabilitation, however I wouldn’t be surprised if an occasional post about the fine arts/fine artists sneaks in. I will also try to make posts on topics and projects that I find interesting as I embark on my educational journey.

Thank you to all my future readers, however many or few of you there may be.

I will leave you with a few pictures I took at Savannah's historic Bonaventure Cemetery
More to come soon but for now............
~please enjoy~

Bonaventure Cemetary